What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July Example

What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July Example What To The Slave Is The Fourth Of July – Article Example Frederick Douglass Who was Frederick Douglass and where did he come from? Fredric Douglas was an American sman, social reformer, and a He was a slave, born in Talbot County, Maryland around 1818. His exact birth year and date are not particularly clear. He was also a revolutionist leader and went on to become one of the most famous intellectuals of his time. His writings are autobiographies that describe his experiences with slavery.2) Discuss Douglas’s use of verbal irony in his introduction?He talks of exercising his limited powers of speech. It is ironic since he is famous for his powerful and inspiring speeches. He is a famous and recognized speech giver, and therefore the issue of limited powers of speech is ironic. He also talks of little experience in addressing the public, which is not true.3) Identify several passages where Douglas’s appeals to values he assumes the audience shares with him. What values associated with the fight for independence does he use to argue for the abolition of slavery?In the fourth paragraph, he talks of the valve of being and truthful. He talks of this value being the direction giver to the destiny of the nation as it should to the whole of humanity. Man should be just to each other the same way the country should be just to its people. In the seventh paragraph, he also talks of the value of sovereignty. Just as, the fore fathers who fought for independence wanted to be free and sovereign, the slaves wanted the same. The slaves, just like the fore fathers pronounce their disgust for oppression. All the slaves want just as the people who fought for independence is their freedom.4) In what ways does Douglass draw upon the principles stated in the declaration of independence to validate his argument?The principle of equality, borrowed by Douglas to illustrate how people feel when the government unjustly treats them, illustrates the slaves’ feelings. In this case, the slaves feel harshly and justly treated b y the masters. They are treated with sovereign indifference, coldness, and scorn. Oppression makes wise men mad, as Douglass states. If not, they become resistive to their treatment. Man just wants to be independent just as the principle of independence in the declaration of independence.5) Douglass admits feeling anger towards some members of his audience. How does he express his anger? Is his anger justified? How would you feel if you were sitting in this audience?While giving his speech, Douglas says that some of his audience does not uphold the virtues of their fathers. He says he admires the actions of the brave men who fought for independence. However, the same values they fought to defend are not upheld. He is justified, as this is true. Slaves are treated the same way the Americans were treated when under a colony. If I was sitting in the audience, I would feel challenged.6) In your own words what is the thesis of Douglass speech?Douglass speech intends to invoke emotions th at would compel people into denouncing slavery. Moreover, the speeches intend to encourage the slaves into embracing a sense of freedom. ReferencesDouglass, F. (1852). What to the Slave is the Fourth of July? July 5, 1852

William Rehnquist, Supreme Court Chief Justice

William Rehnquist, Supreme Court Chief Justice President Richard M. Nixon appointed William Rehnquist to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1971. Fifteen years later President Ronald Reagan named him as the court’s Chief Justice, a position that he held until his death in 2005. During the last eleven years of his term on the Court, there was not a single change in the roster of nine justices. Early Life and Career Born in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on October 1, 1924, his parents named him William Donald. He would later change his middle name to Hubbs, a family name after a numerologist informed Rehnquist’s mother that he would be more successful with the middle initial of H.   Rehnquist attended Kenyon College in Gambier, Ohio for one quarter before joining the U.S. Air Force during World War II. Although he served from 1943 to 1946, Rehnquist did not see any combat. He was assigned to a meteorology program and was stationed for a time in North Africa as a weather observer. After being discharged from the Air Force, Rehnquist attended Stanford University where he received both a bachelors and a masters degree in political science. Rehnquist then went to Harvard University where he received a masters in government before attending Stanford Law School where he graduated first in his class in 1952 while Sandra Day OConnor graduated third in that same class. Upon graduation from law school, Rehnquist spent a year working for U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson as one of his law clerks.   As a law clerk, Rehnquist authored a very controversial memo defending the Court’s decision in Plessy v. Ferguson. Plessy was opinion as a landmark case that was decided in 1896 and upheld the constitutionality of laws passed by states that required racial segregation in public facilities under the separate but equal doctrine. This memo advised Justice Jackson to uphold Plessy in deciding Brown v. Board of Education in which a unanimous court ended up overturning Plessy.   From Private Practice to the Supreme Court Rehnquist spent 1953 to 1968 working in private practice in Phoenix before returning to Washington, D.C. in 1968 where he worked as an assistant attorney general for the Office of Legal Counsel until President Nixon appointed him as an associate Supreme Court justice. While Nixon was impressed with Rehnquist’ support for debatable procedures such as pretrial detention and wiretapping, but civil rights leaders, as well as some Senators, were not impressed due to the Plessy memo that Rehnquist had written some nineteen years earlier. During confirmation hearings, Rehnquist was grilled about the memo to which he responded that the memo accurately reflected Justice Jacksons views at the time it was written and was not pensive of his own views. Although some believed him to be a right-wing fanatic, Rehnquist was easily confirmed by the Senate. Rehnquist quickly showed the conservative nature of his views when joined Justice Byron White as being the only two who dissented from the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. In addition, Rehnquist also voted against school desegregation. He voted in favor of school prayer, capital punishment, and states rights. Upon Chief Justice Warren Burger retirement in 1986, the Senate confirmed his appointment to replace Burger by a 65 to 33 vote. President Reagan nominated Antonin Scalia to fill vacant associate justice seat. By 1989, President Reagan’s appointments had created a new right majority which allowed the Rehnquist-led Court to release a number of conservative rulings on issues like capital punishment, affirmative action, and abortion. Also, Rehnquist led wrote the 1995 opinion in the United States v. Lopez case, in which 5 to 4 majority struck down as unconstitutional a federal act which made it illegal to carry a gun in a school zone. Rehnquist served as the presiding judge in President Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial. Further, Rehnquist supported the Supreme Court decision, Bush v. Gore, which ended attempts to recount Florida votes in the 2000 presidential election.  On the other hand, although the Rehnquist Court had the opportunity, it declined to overrule the libera l decisions of Roe v. Wade and Miranda v. Arizona.